Archive for July, 2003

105958849439090264

Wednesday, July 30th, 2003

One More Missing Piece

Number 7 on my list of the ten books left off the 100 best of the 20th century list:

Labyrinths, by Jorge Luis Borges

It�s hard to recommend one Borges book as the man never wrote anything but short stories and essays, all of which have been collected in various combinations. Likewise it is hard to recommend just one story as the shiniest diamond on the heap as they�re all great jewels of literature and for wildly different reasons. I picked Labyrinths mainly because it�s the one I have. And it�s the one I have because it contains my favorite Borges story, Tlon, Uqbar, Orbus Tertius.

The space needed to adequately summarize this story would be longer than the story itself. And that�s what is so great about Borges. His concision is razor sharp and he manages, somehow to do more in one five page story than most novelists can do with a whole trilogy. In one paragraph he�ll reference some obscure Brazilian custom, a fifteenth century alchemist, Don Quixote, a Sufi parable and a popular movie from the nineteen twenties without it seeming the least bit claustrophobic or pretentious. He can casually discuss the merits of Gnostic Eschatology as if it were common practice to run excerpts from Second Century Coptic texts in the lifestyle section of the Sunday paper.

Labyrinths also contains a selection of great essays and parables. Reading them is like reading some super dense library from the future, written by someone who was never told that everything worth saying has already been said.

Also, Borges is the reason I want to be a librarian, as he was, in the hope that I can maybe just get a glimpse inside the headspace of someone who wrote such profound stories.

105950378108421210

Tuesday, July 29th, 2003

Have you Seen This Book?

Number six on my list of the 10 books left off of everyone else�s best 100 books of the 20th century list:

Another Roadside Attraction, by Tom Robbins

It�s simply criminal to leave Tom Robbins off of any top 10 list (unless it�s a list of the ten most dastardly things to come from Satan�s sock drawer). To omit him entirely from the top 100 best books of the 20th century is practically a crime against humanity.

As with any Tom Robbins book the plot is nearly impossible to summarize and still have it make any sense. Suffice it to say, it involves the mummified corpse of Jesus, a magician�s underpants, the nature of human belief systems and the animistic properties of hot dogs.

This is Tom Robbins first book, going way back to 1971, if you can believe it. Like Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Another Roadside Attraction deals with the aftermath of the collapse of the sixties. But this book is the other side of the coin. Where fear and Loathing is a drag race through the burning ruins of a revolution fueled by adrenachrome and cocaine, Another Roadside is a stroll through a crumbled graveyard while munching mushrooms and smoking pot.

Other then the same general themes, the two books have nothing in common and I probably shouldn�t have even compared them– like apples and star fruit, that�s how alike they are. But it�s too late now. Too Late I tell you!

Another Roadside Attraction has some of Mr. Robbins most glorious prose and should be read if only to fully enjoy the poetic possibilities of the English language. Along the way though you might just fall in love with the lisping gypsy that is Amanda, and learn from a trained baboon named Mon Cul the only word in the English language that rhymes with orange. The mere possibility of such a thing is reason enough to read this book and treasure it as one of the most overlooked and under recognized works of literature.

105942555954221974

Monday, July 28th, 2003

Freedom Does Not Come In A Happy Meal

��When stood next to the choice of American political parties (�So, would you like Right Wing, or Supersized Right Wing with Extra Fries?�) my English fuzzy middle-of-the-roadness probably translates easily as bomb-throwing Trotskyist…�

Other than the fact that I am not English, nor very middle of the road (though I do read the Guardian from time to time) this statement by Neil Gaiman pretty much sums up my feelings of American politics at the moment.

It seems to me that sometime during the last three years American politicians as a whole took one giant step to the right so now Liberals are, at best, Centrists while the Centrist are what we called in my youth, Conservatives while what passes for Conservative these days is an appalling confab of Religious Fundies, Racists and genuine, old school Fascists. The problem of course is that it�s this last group who have hijacked the White House and replaced sound Fiscal practices with Voodoo Economics and fifty years of foreign diplomacy with the sort of crass Imperialism not seen since the days of the Caesars. You know, the really bad Caesars like Nero and Elagabalus, not the relatively cuddly Caesars like Julius or Augustus.

In other words, we�re only a pair of jackboots away from overt Dictatorship.

OK, maybe I�m exaggerating. Maybe I�m just giving in to the ol� hyperbole. But when was the last time you saw a politician in this country that was honestly Liberal? Maybe it hasn�t been just in the last three years that we�ve shifted rightward; I suppose we could look back to Reagan and see a gradual shift to the right from there on, so that now we�ve got to the point where members of the Project for a New American Century are running our country. Or ruining it, depending on how you like illegal invasions for dubious reasons.

The thing is, I�m not entirely sure that just voting Democrat and hoping for the best is going to cut it anymore since Democrats aren�t really that much better; sure they are slightly better but how much, really? I kind of like Howard Dean and think he has a good chance of winning the Democratic nomination and even the White House. But he ain�t liberal, by any stretch of the imagination.

Now, I know we can�t swing back to the left in one fell swoop as it�d probably break our necks. Taking it one step at a time is a good way to start but still, I�m rather fed up with the Lesser-of-Two-Evils style of voting that has become the American standard practice for determining who will be elected Leader of the Free World (or appointed Caesar of the chained Empire, in Bush�s case).

Of course, this is all assuming we will have a fair election in 2004, which is not a guarantee. It should be, considering it�s in the constitution but that�s really the heart of my point; our own freedoms are no longer inalienable and none of our leaders seem to care very much, since they all seem to be getting corporate contributions to ensure that just the opposite becomes the norm. Which is why I�m wondering if voting and sending e-mails and letters to my representatives is even worth it. I�ve been doing just those things and according to what I was taught in Government class back in High school, this should be working. But it�s not. So what do you do when the system doesn�t work? And how do you do it in a way that functions within the parameters of the system and won�t earn you a visit from the friendly folks at the FBI or an open ended vacation in Cuba?

I don�t know but I need to find out soon because, frankly, if I don�t get my country back soon, I might start to consider the bomb throwing Trotskyists as a viable political alternative. Either that or just move to Canada.

105914514316820088

Friday, July 25th, 2003

Still Missing

Number five on my list of the 10 books left off the best of the 20th century lists was going to be City of Glass by Paul Auster. But I�ve changed my mind. It�s still a fabulous book (I�m rereading it now, actually) but it�s not one of the ten most overlooked books from the 20th. In it�s place I�ve decided to put

Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk

Now I admit that I saw the movie first. Elvira and I saw a trailer for it, were in the mood for a movie and decided to check it out a sit looked weird, kind of cool and had one of the all time best Pixies songs ever in it. We figured it�d be some action flick. We were wrong but I have never been so delightedly wrong in my life. The movie brought up so many ideas that, at the time, I was just starting to deal with. And when I saw that it was based on a book, I decided to check it out. This was surprise number two.

I have mixed feelings about movies based on books because 99 times out of 100 the book is better and the movie pales because it either leaves out great important themes or plot points or they changed things so much that it�s only loosely based on the original material. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is a good example and so is the Movie the Ninth Gate (a good film by Roman Polanski but nothing even remotely as interesting as the Club Dumas).

Fight Club was different though. I still haven�t decided which I like better. And frankly it doesn�t matter as they are so similar and the film so true to the book that they are that rare example of how a good story can exist in any medium successfully.

Now it�s not for the squeamish. It�s violent and nihilistic but Chuck Palahniuk uses these qualities that could otherwise anesthetize a reader to instead open their mind and make them think about things that our culture often refuses to think about. Like what it means to be a man in a decaying western society that has deemed your million-year -old biological drives obsolete; how do you hunt and gather and procreate when everything you need is at the grocery store and science has made you little more then just a resource for sperm? Or what one must go through these days in order to experience a genuine moment that isn�t mediated through an add agency trying to sell you something.

Plus, it�s really fucking funny. In a morbid, twisted sort of way. Read the chapter about Marla�s mother and tell me you didn�t even chuckle. I dare you.

105906493088610589

Thursday, July 24th, 2003

Something Missing, Still

Number four on my list of the 10 books left off the best of the 20th century lists:

Siddhartha, Herman Hesse

About ten years ago, Siddhartha was one of those books that was required reading for anyone with even a pretense of being well read. When I tell people these days that it�s one of my favorite books they just sort of smile and nod and humor me, like I just told them I think the backs of cereal boxes are underrated as literature. I suppose reading a moving, thoughtful story of Prince Siddhartha�s journey to enlightenment is considered a sign of one�s Unamerican views now that the mass culture has deemed Multiculturalism a dirty word.

Has anyone else noticed this? Elvira and I were talking about this just the other day, that now it seems to be socially acceptable to show off your Christian Piety, wave a flag and casually drop Bible quotes in conversation, especially if they trample on any spiritual ideas that aren�t Christian, support the killing of children in far off countries or generally reinforce the small town bigotry of Protestantism. It�s a disturbing trend and one that seems to becoming more pervasive. OK people, just because a bunch of wacky Muslims don�t like us doesn�t mean you can bring the white hoods out of the closet and start setting crosses on fire. Did you ever stop to think that we as a culture just might have done something to deserve a little bit of flaming Karma? And I�m apologizing for terrorists or making excuses for their own forms of bigotry. It�s just that I feel it needs to be said: 9/11 didn�t give us all carte blanche to hate again. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs desperately to read this book.

Enlightenment is what Siddhartha is all about and something this country and this planet could use a little more of; something slight and luminous– a slice of Nirvana on Earth. Read Herman Hesse�s classic, proudly, out loud while sitting in the park sipping lemonade. Give copies to your friends on their birthdays. Next time some little old lady hands you a Bible tract, hand her your copy of Siddhartha as a trade off.

105898096691509762

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2003

Magic Words

A lot of people overlook books these days as just another commodity. Some Thing that is bought, sold, collected and ultimately, forgotten about. Nothing more important than a souvenir of some sporting event; far less important than a good TV set. This is a false assumption. For proof, just look at the number of people who are so eager to burn books that contain ideas that they do not approve of.

And that is the key to the mystery. It is because books contain ideas that they are so revered, feared, loved and hated, or at least used to be. They are a focal point for ideas. If we want to get philosophical, you could look at a book as a tangible manifestation of an intangible idea. This attitude is what gave us the concept of a Holy Book in the first place. Our ancestors regarded Books as vessels containing ideas so important to a society that to treat the pages and binding as anything less than Holy was a crime.

We consider ourselves more enlightened these days and more egalitarian. A Book is just a book after all, just wood fibers pressed into paper, printed with inks made from common minerals. The ideas contained in them, well, that�s an intangible thing, best left unmentioned.

Well, let�s mention it.

A Book contains ideas, Memes, in the current jargon. Memes get lodged into the brain of the reader, entering through their eyeballs. They stay there and they collide with other Memes, with childhood memories, parental and societal conditioning. Memes are promiscuous, they rub up against each other in cramped spaces and no space is as cramped as the mind of a well-read individual. It�s an orgy of ideas, begetting all manner if unquiet, improper little notions. Ideas that want to spread out, stretch and dance. So they find their way back into books, if the individual can quiet the chatter outside long enough to listen to the chatter inside and write it all down.

So then the books get passed around like the bottles of beer on the wall, never really ending, spreading memes, ideas and the intangible things associated with them all around. Here�s where books get weird.

There�s a phenomenon, it has no name but everyone I�m sure has experienced it in some form or another. It happens like this: Someone gives you a book for your birthday. Let�s say it�s a copy of Hamlet. A nice copy, not some cheep Mass Market that�s all dog eared and highlighted form years of being read in school but a nice cloth bound copy of Shakespeare�s most highly regarded play. One of your personal favorites that you haven�t read in a while. The next day your walking downtown and you pass by the local art house theater and what are they showing that night but Hamlet. Only it�s not the Ethan Hawk version. Or even the Mel Gibson version or the Kenneth Branagh version but the 1948, Laurence Olivier version of Hamelt. The one you saw as a kid on scratchy, often watched VHS.

Oh but that�s just a coincidence. There�s nothing spooky about a small town theater showing a fifty five year old film. Maybe, maybe not.

Try this one on then. My friend Jason sent me an e-mail today, informing me of some family legal problems that neither he nor I can get into right now. But this is the part that got me thinking:

Do you believe that books sometimes appear in your life for a reason? Well, not long ago I was given, by a co-worker, Mikal Gilmore’s Shot In The Heart , about his brother Gary Gilmore, the last man to be executed by firing squad in the US, and the subject of N. Mailer’s The Executioner’s Song . The book is about family secrets, the shock of dealing with them, and the long hard look into the past that such coping requires. A more apropos tome could not have insinuated itself with more Jungian synchronicity than this little bastard did. It’s a great book, told in a beautifully spare, rugged tone, by a man who is trying to get at the root of his own problems, which are meager compared to the other members of his family, but nonetheless share the same twisted genesis. Show me a man who believes that something like this is a coincidence and I’ll show you an ostrich with its head in the sand.

So all you ostrichs, call me superstitious. Call me drug addled. But what if books really are focal points for intangible forces? Obviously some will be more than others and I think this has to do with our culture�s propensity to mass-produce, that it dilutes the power of a book. Obviously 100,000 copies of Stephen King�s The Stand is going to attract far less synchronicity than say, Shot in the Heart. In this case, burning a book only makes the remaining copies all that more potent. Something the anti-Harry Potter/ Jesus freak crowd should chew on next time they advertise a bonfire.

Of course there�s a whole causality issue here; which came first, the book or the synchronous events but that�s an old riddle pertaining to chickens and eggs that I don�t have an answer for. I just wanted to ask the question.

Someday soon I�ll write something about my own very weird experience that started the day my copy of Robert Anton Wilson�s Cosmic Trigger I arrived in the mail. For anyone familiar with RAW�s writing and especially the Cosmic Trigger trilogy I�ll just say it was damn spooky and has never fully been explained in any way satisfactory to my mind.

But as Mr. Wilson would say, it does give cause for one to wonder fiercely.

105888656254764805

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2003

Something Missing, part 2

Number 3 on my list of the 10 books overlooked as the best of the 20th century is

Radio Free Albemuth, by Philip K. Dick

A paranoid incompetant has schemed his way into the White House and convulsed America in a vicious war against imaginary internal enemies. A struggling science fiction writer named Philip K. Dick is trying to keep from becoming one pf the war’s casualties. And Dick’s best friend, a record executive named Nicholas Brady, is recieving transmissions from an extraterrestrial entity that may also happen to be God– an entity that apparently wants him to overthrow the President.

Normally, I distrust the back cover summary on a book. They’re reductionist by nature and often innacurate altogether. But Radio Free Albemuth is different. The above description accurately sums up the plot but it also gives you a handle on what is, by its very nature, dodgy subject matter. Anyone at all familiar with Phil Dick’s Valis material will know what I mean. Anyone who isn’t should go read Valis, The Transmigration of Timothy Archer, and the Divine Invasion. Then read Albemuth, which takes the real life events of Philip Dick’s own mind mangling experiences, pink phosphor lasers and all, and remixes them into a single, last moving story about two men trying to live in an insane world.

A lot of people have written how El Presidente Bush resembles Big Brother or Dr. Strangelove more and more every day. But they aren’t even close; he’s Ferris F. Fremont, down to the cowboy hat, vacant gaze and mindless snear. Read Radio Free albemuth and shiver at how truely frightening the similarities between this parallel Earth of the eighties resembles real life today.

Aramcheck, help us.

105880861534638014

Monday, July 21st, 2003

Blah, Blah, Blah…

I haven�t felt like writing much these past few days. I don�t know why, other than that I�m still getting over a persistent cold. You�d think I would be all fired up, seeing as how I�m about half way through a great little story about a young girl and her demonic doll but for some reason I�m just not very focused. And it�s not the cold� I wrote 4000 words last week when I was worse off than I am now.

Maybe I�m anxious over starting Grad School soon. A month from today in fact I�ll be heading up to Maryland. I�ve never been to the University of Maryland; it�s been four years since I was last in college at all, and that was SCAD, which is sort of a joke of a college, to be honest. I mean come on they gave me a degree in comic books, how serious could they be? So I�m a good eight years out of any rigorous sort of academic lifestyle, I�m going to be away from my wife for weeks if not months at a time… So I guess it could be that I�m just a little distracted.

Not that I�m really all that worried about the academic part, from what I�ve heard form other people who have gotten their MLS, the classes are pretty simple; basically, if you know your alphabet and can write the occasional paragraph explaining something simple, it�s a breeze. Having just completed a 58,500 word novel and being half way through a 30,000 word novella, I think I can handle the writing and the research (something I actually enjoy doing; most people think that writing fiction, you just sit down and write whatever comes into your head but there�s a lot of actual fact checking and research involved and something satisfying about doing it, especially when its of your own volition rather than for some silly research paper on the Roman Aqueduct or the causes of the Civil War).

I don�t for a minute believe in writers block (for evidence, reread the above three paragraphs). That�s just an excuse for being lazy and if I�m going to be lazy, I don�t need an excuse; I�ll simply be lazy. This is different, I have the desire to write but when I sit down at the computer I decide to instead play on the Internet or watch a movie instead. And it�s mot like I lack self discipline (did I mention my novel? The 260 page one I spent a year writing?)

Perhaps I am just being lazy, distracted and sick. I think I�ll go watch Farscape and cough up a lung, while trying not to think about the fact that I just took out a huge loan for an education in a field I�m not entirely sure I want to be in.

105846213462661903

Thursday, July 17th, 2003

For some reason I seem to be in procrastination mode today. I’ve been very good this week, having written over 4000 words of my current story (”The Black Doll”, which is a sweet coming of age story about a young girl and her heartwarming relastionship wirh an ancient doll poseessed by demon). But I just can’t get motivated today. Perhaps a pot of coffee and a moment of silence to clear my head…

Nope. Still procrastinating. Ooh! I have Farscape DVDs to watch!

Pray for me…

105829076931641811

Tuesday, July 15th, 2003

Something Missing

During my vacation I perused the Internet, scanning various lists of the 100 greatest works of fiction of the 20th century. There are quite a few and not all of them agree. Sure, the basic titles and author�s you�d expect show up on almost all of them: Kafka, Joyce, Faulkner, blah, blah, blah. I couldn�t help but notice some (in my view) glaring omissions though, mostly a few of the more obscure authors and titles that have greatly influenced my own writing. So I decided to put together a list of my top 100. Then I realized what a lot of work that is so I decided to cut it short at 50. Still, there�s a lot of overlap with other lists, so here is my list of the 10 greatest books of the twentieth Century that were left off of most everyone else�s list (in no particular order):

1. The Hearing Trumpet, Leonora Carrington

2. In watermelon Sugar, Richard Brautigan

3. Radio Free Albemuth, Philip K. Dick

4 Siddhartha, Herman Hesse

5. City of Glass, Paul Auster

6. Another Roadside Attraction, Tom Robbins

7. Labyrinths, Jorge Luis Borges

8. The Exploits and Opinions of Dr. Faustroll Pataphysician, Alfred Jarry

9. The Martian Chronicles, Ray Bradbury

10. Illuminatus!, Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea

I�ll be posting sporadically little capsule reviews of each book. Here are the first two:

1. The Hearing Trumpet, by Leonora Carrington

A coven of little old ladies, with the help of a pack of wolves, a nest of bees and a freelance mailman named Taliesin, steel the Holy Grail from the descendants of the Crusaders and return it to the Goddess from whence the Christians stole it in the first place. While illuminating the pagan roots of the Christian Mythology, Leonora Carrington also admonishes the church for its historically cruel treatment of women, especially the elderly variety, as second class citizens. But more then that, Carrington, a surrealist painter and writer, manages to evoke a brilliant sense of dreaminess and real emotion, something conspicuously absent from most surrealist writings. Personally, this is one of my all time favorite books. I�ve read it three times, and will probably read it for a fourth very soon.

2. In Watermelon Sugar, by Richard Brautigan

Richard Brautigan has been all but forgotten by the world of literature, it seems. Which is sad because his books are so joyful, melencholy and funny that to let them slip into obscurity is, I think, a loss to humanity. I think the reason he has been junked is because of his late fifties, early sixties Late Beat, proto-Hippy voice. You can picture him sitting in a tent in the woods, smoking a joint and dancing in the moonlight with some hairy girlfriend. Now, I hate Hippies as much as the next guy. But he manages to evoke the appreciation of innocence, the silly optimism in the face of existential horror of modern life; all that is good in Hippiedom, without the dirty feet and self-righteous hypocrisy. Aftr all, when the eities rolled around and all the other Hippies went home to mommy and daddy and became yuppies Brautigan at least had the guts and the honesty to kill himself instead of voting Republican.

Oh, and the book is about this strange group of people living in a post apocalyptic utopia where all the days are lit by different colored suns and tigers eat the parents of the narrator, then help him with his arithmetic. They eat some carots, make statues out of wastermelon sugar and despite all reason are happy.

This book is curently only available in an omnibus with Trout Fishing in America, probably the best novel ever written about absolutely nothing and a collection of mediocre poetry. I recomend all three, even the poetry. Some of it isn’t too bad.