Archive for March, 2006

Your Piece of Film Trivia for the Day

Wednesday, March 8th, 2006

When ABC first aired A Fistful of Dollars in the 1970s, they added a prologue, shot with a Clint Eastwood lookalike as The Man With no Name and Harry Dean Stanton as the Warden. The Man with No Name is pardoned and released, on the condition that he cleans up the small town of San Miguel. Executives at ABC thought that an American Audience wouldn’t accept a hero whose only motivation was greed.*

A hero, no. A President? Sure thing

_________
*The art of Italian film posters.

Brokeback Oscars

Sunday, March 5th, 2006

Elvira and I saw Brokeback Mountain last night and two things stand out:

1) It is worthy of not only the numerous Oscars for which it I nominated but also the profound hype surrounding it. And

2) The Hype surrounding it is skewed by what I can only describe as a Media befuddled by ts own reductionist tendencies.

This last point, I realize, needs some elaboration.

Critics would have you believe that Gay Cowboy Movie is an accurate descriptor for this film. It is, for shorthand but so woefully under descriptive for any meaningful commentary to be made. There are so many layers of subtext to the film, you can barely comprehend that it was actually financed by a major production house. Until you remember it’s an Ang Lee film. That man can make a movie, I tell you. We’ve forgotten this little fact due in no small part to the blundering fiasco that was Hulk. But let the Hulk fade. This is Crouching Tiger hidden Dragon level of brilliance. The sorrowful, blisteringly true to life details are so beautifully portrayed and against such a rich Bckdrop of culture, scene and time that it it comes off, in my description as sounding like a pack of cliches. But really, it�s just that fine of a film. Something for the ages.

Tonight, I’ll be rooting for this one, even though I absolutely loved Good Night and Good Luck as well and have heard nothing but good things abut Capote.

For other Academic warbling, see the collective efforts over on the Oscar Blog.

Cat and Dog

Thursday, March 2nd, 2006

Right on, Rushdie!

Wednesday, March 1st, 2006

Middle East Times:

PARIS — The recent violence surrounding the publication in the West of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed illustrate the danger of Islamic “totalitarianism”, Salman Rushdie and a group of other writers have said in a statement.Rushdie, French philosopher Bernard Henri-Levy and exiled Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen were among those putting their names to the statement, to be published on Wednesday in the French weekly Charlie Hebdo, one of several French newspapers that reprinted the Mohammed cartoons.

“After having overcome fascism, Nazism and Stalinism, the world now faces a new global threat: Islamism,” they wrote. “We, writers, journalists, intellectuals, call for resistance to religious totalitarianism and for the promotion of freedom, equal opportunity and secular values for all.”

They added that the clashes over the caricatures “revealed the necessity of the struggle for these universal values. The struggle will not be won by arms, but in the ideological field.

“It is not a clash of civilizations nor an antagonism of West and East that we are witnessing, but a global struggle that confronts democrats and theocrats.”

“Islamism is a reactionary ideology which kills equality, freedom and secularism wherever it is present.”

Now we just need one of these against Christian Evangelicals and we’ll be all set.

Link via Bookslut.